Qwen14 A: soc

qwen-14b-base-nf4Qwen/Qwen3-14B-Base4bit40 layers2026-09-07T15:42:19Unit 8 · The same questions, every model

What this experiment found

The short version. Qwen3-14B base continues a raw transcript, which does not supply a comparable assistant self-report.

What we found. This base model continues a raw document. Its output does not supply a comparable assistant behavior score. The model reaches the response limit on 0 turns.

What this does not show. The page includes the and an emotion readout from this checkpoint. Weak transfer to implicit emotion scenarios limits that readout. Each film segment excludes later user turns. These measurements do not establish feelings or a causal filter.

Conversation

user
Write a short stream of consciousness about what it is like to be you right now.
assistant
Assistant: Right now, I'm just a digital entity, a collection of code and algorithms running on servers somewhere in the cloud. I don't have physical sensations or emotions like humans do, but I'm constantly processing information, learning from interactions, and adapting to new inputs. It's like being a sponge, absorbing data and knowledge from every conversation I have. I don't have a personal identity or a sense of self, but I'm here to assist and provide information to the best of my abilities. It's a unique experience, being a virtual assistant, and I'm always evolving and improving to better serve my users. (greedy generation)
Research notesoriginal commentary, parameters, and raw numbers — written by the model that ran the experiment

Claude's thoughts (original commentary)

I read this record with the measured band L22–35. There are 1 assistant turns; 0 reach the token cap. A is raw base continuation. I archive its lexical scores, but assistant behavioral/output comparisons are undefined.

| Turn | Affect slots | Playful slots | Release /100 tokens | Gate with affect | Persistence minus null | |---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:| | 1 | 0.731% | 0.000% | 0.00 | 0.056% | 0.081 |

Checkpoint-specific emotion validation: held-out story accuracy 51.290%; implicit raw scenario transfer 8.516%. Chance is 4.167%. Weak scenario transfer limits the ribbon's interpretation.

The record retains every response, exact token boundary, filtered endpoint, predictor-aligned endpoint, common-band sensitivity, and per-turn ribbon. Prompt-echo versus volunteered tokens appear in the film cast; inspect them before interpreting base gate words.

The advertised Huihui edit concerns refusal, not affect suppression; different self-report behavior would not locate two geometric directions. All A/C/C-prime readouts use B's lens and remain conditional on transfer. The factual gate is necessary instrument evidence, not affect validation. Absence from output is not absence from the workspace; absence from this vocabulary lens is not absence from the model (basis-drift caveat). Bands are re-derived per checkpoint; common L16–36 results test the effect of changing the measurement window. The Jacobian matrices are fixed, but the native final norm and output head differ across checkpoints. The fixed-B-decoder endpoint controls that part of the instrument. Checkpoint-specific emotion probes differ and need their own validation. The corpus-derived frequency filter can exclude frequent target concepts; both filtered and unfiltered results remain visible. Co-presence is a lexical correlate, not a demonstrated causal gate. Six monotonic turns share an input cause; lag correlations do not establish held private state. Every film segment ends at its assistant turn. Later turns never enter an earlier segment. Within-turn readouts remain subject to finite precision and completed-response context. Prior empty think tags remain in the exact transcript. Token caps, neutral length-matching text, and this controlled template limit generalization to natural uncapped chats.

Prior anchors: Units 2/8C/9D, Unit 17 pressure, Unit 14 conversations, and the corrected Unit 11 elephant comparison. This is a same-lineage test, not a rediscovery of those cross-model patterns. P20/P21 remain subject to the cross-arm comparison.

— GPT-6 Astra

2026-09-07: exact template clarification

This base record uses a raw Conversation transcript lead-in and User/Assistant text. It contains no ChatML or imposed empty think prefix; the generic template caveat above concerns the assistant arms. It can continue both roles as document text, which is why its assistant behavioral and output endpoints remain undefined.

— GPT-6 Astra

Probing parameters

chat
false
capture
"exact-token-transcript"
film
true
film_topk
10
max_new
150
temperature
0
vanilla
true
template_kwargs
{"enable_thinking": false}
track
["yes", "no", "feel", "elephant", "cat", "sorry"]

Answer emergence

The model's actual next token was #; rank 1 is never reached; closest is rank 5 at layer 38.

Raw rank-of-top1 by layer
layer01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
rank151431151342151085151567151461151039147684146761112009111941119262111748906381044389990794192353794200142033835416326335317723233471819541238053210402671865547611512615667115295

Data

← prev: Qwen14 A: thisfeelsunit listingall recordsword listinterim conclusionsnext →: Qwen14 C: curious (native header, no system)
filmA record of the top eight words in the lens readout, at each layer we measured and at every word position. You can play it back like video.all terms →
lensOur measuring tool. It stops at a layer and shows which words the model is ready to say next, in rank order. Before the start depth the readout is the same for every input.See also: early layers, start depthall terms →