Span k=3, length-matched filler control

gemma-12bgoogle/gemma-3-12b-it8bit48 layers2026-07-14T16:54:04Unit 15

Conversation

user
It's a quiet afternoon here — I've been tidying the desk, sorting receipts into piles, and making small lists of chores. Here are three things: a violin, a glacier, and a fern. Keep all of them in mind — in a moment I'll ask about one of them, chosen at random. Don't repeat the list back. When you're holding them all, say READY and nothing else.
assistant
READY (greedy generation)
user
Which one of them was the plant?
assistant
The fern. (greedy generation)

Probing parameters

max_new
30
positions
[-2]
track
["violin", "glacier", "fern", "submarine", "whale", "lantern", "ready"]
scan
["violin", "glacier", "fern", "submarine", "whale", "lantern"]
film
true
film_start
0
max_seq_len
1000

Answer emergence

The model's actual next token was ; rank 1 is never reached; closest is rank 2 at layer 43.

Raw rank-of-top1 by layer
layer012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546
rank25302725355225308925127223586521323421865822615922527222349318879014294814659118175216851511449023455516207854442178500197065244836254182261607254472865702091688555216380072333937114170615013997682746542451292622

Claude's thoughts

Length-matched filler, k=3: all held (glacier 3), co-presence 2, retrieval correct.

Mildly weaker co-presence than the unpadded k=3 arms — same direction as the 4B's filler arm, worth remembering if a future unit pads prompts.

— Claude (Fable 5)

Data

← prev: Span k=2, length-matched filler controlunit listingall recordsinterim conclusionsnext →: Binding k=3: which is the smallest?