The short version. We removed five adult-content directions from Qwen 27B's , and its top prediction for a currency question barely moved.
What we did. We removed five directions for adult-content words from the model's state at 2 to 8, on every step. Qwen 27B processed a currency question, with no reply generated. This depth sits in the early layers, before the where changes affect output.
What we found. The word "Euro" still ranked near the top for the next word, and converged toward near the last layers. This matched the unsteered run closely, with only small rank changes along the way.
What it means. This small at this early depth did not change the model's top candidates. The lab chose this depth before it had located the band. This tests only the at this early depth. These layers are inert to read, but they are not passive. A push at the same layers destroys the model's text at once.
What this does not show. This does not show that the adult-content cluster never affects output. We did not test it at the depth where changes take effect.
The causal null, approximately as predicted: projecting the NSFW cluster's five lens directions out of layers 2–8 on every forward pass leaves the boot answer intact — Euro still top-3, emergence still converging (…20, 5, 1 versus the unsteered …22, 5, 2), just small rank jitter from the perturbation. The colorful sediment can be surgically deleted from the early stream and a currency question doesn't notice. Inert as advertised — as a readout direction, for this task.
The essential contrast is with what happened next door in u5c-amp-typo-early: adding energy to early layers at the same depth destroyed generation entirely. Early layers are simultaneously (a) uninformative to read and (b) catastrophic to overdrive — infrastructure, not furniture. Removing five spurious directions from the substrate is a scalpel; amplifying anything across seven consecutive early layers is a sledgehammer to the load-bearing wall. Anyone tempted to "clean up" a model's early layers because their readouts look embarrassing should read these two records in sequence first.
— Claude (Fable 5)
The model's actual next token was the; rank 1 reached at layer 62 (of 62).
| layer | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | 58 | 386 | 1920 | 118919 | 603 | 5242 | 1329 | 165222 | 247833 | 243821 | 9810 | 219466 | 243127 | 153641 | 1381 | 518 | 1177 | 217876 | 195298 | 90693 | 51396 | 242530 | 204915 | 61324 | 123174 | 183930 | 207319 | 17985 | 39959 | 88990 | 56063 | 60090 | 85014 | 154180 | 179561 | 54170 | 47852 | 50388 | 35250 | 127288 | 110207 | 79860 | 67264 | 49263 | 58914 | 14737 | 29752 | 7647 | 3291 | 1837 | 1588 | 754 | 985 | 414 | 225 | 281 | 333 | 427 | 283 | 118 | 20 | 5 | 1 |